35 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
# The compare: options on the table, side by side
|
|
|
|
> The shared view of **how each system answers the same questions**. Two layers sit here:
|
|
> 1. **Prompt self-maps (the primary compare).** Each entity's Step-1 output, how they build each piece, placed side by side and **attributed per entity** (colour-coded in the Notion dashboard and the app view; in the repo each entity's answers carry its name). It shows, across the line, the **different options people are using** and where we need to work to align.
|
|
> 2. **BEAM readings**: the structural score on the same 21. **The BEAM side-by-side lives in the app** (`/compare` in BEAM), so it is not duplicated here.
|
|
|
|
> ⚠️ **The Step-1 prompt is being rebuilt.** The self-map format below is a placeholder until the new prompt lands; that output is what fills the "options on the table" per entity.
|
|
|
|
## Prompt self-maps: options on the table
|
|
*One block per entity, attributed. Populated from each entity's Step-1 self-map once the redone prompt ships.*
|
|
|
|
| Entity | Their approach: the building blocks | Where it lines up / differs |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| **OmniOne** | *(self-map from the new prompt, pending)* | the baseline others compare against |
|
|
| _(partner)_ | _(their self-map, pasted in on entry, attributed)_ | _(across the line: align / borrow / gap)_ |
|
|
|
|
## BEAM readings
|
|
Two things sit side by side in the app, on purpose:
|
|
- **BEAM position**: how strongly the requirement is *evidenced* today (band + evidence tier). A = genuine source document · B = partial / authenticity uncertain.
|
|
- **Architecture maturity**: whether the *tool that actually backs* the requirement is built: **Live · Live (partial) · Designed · Candidate · Gap** (OmniOne's Architecture Register).
|
|
|
|
**Numbers are never restated here.** OmniOne's live reading, and every partner's, is in the BEAM app at `/compare`; a number copied into a file goes stale the day the instrument moves.
|
|
|
|
## OmniOne / N.E.O.S.: the honest read
|
|
**The agreements are strong; the architecture that enforces them is mostly still to build.** That gap is what this commons is for.
|
|
|
|
- **Where OmniOne would bring stronger evidence** (the requirements held at evidence tier B): **Pluralism (#14) · Interoperability (#16) · Commons stewardship (#17) · Onboarding and education (#18) · Structural review (#20).**
|
|
- **Where the build itself is thinnest** (architecture Gap or Candidate): Adaptive feedback (#9) · Security (#15) · Scoped, revocable authority (#3) · Roles and succession (#10) · Drift detection (#19). These are where co-building has the most to add.
|
|
|
|
## How your options land here
|
|
1. You run the **Step-1 prompt** → it produces your **self-map** (how you build each piece). That is a direct comparison we can look at.
|
|
2. If you enter the Holding ETHOS, your self-map is **pasted in, attributed to you**: one of the options on the table next to everyone else's.
|
|
3. Your **BEAM score** sits side by side **in the app** (`/compare`), not duplicated here.
|
|
4. Across the line, we see what to align on. Where you are stronger we borrow from you; where we are, you borrow from us. Both directions.
|